Phased Launch
$50M cap at Phase 0. Full GCSR by Phase 2.
Problem
How does the protocol launch without immediate exposure to the worst-case scenarios in the bounded-dilution proof?
Solution
Four phases. Cap and ratio constraints relax on observable criteria.
| Phase | Window | Supply cap | Ratio | SZK cap | Layer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 0 | Months 1–6 | $50M | 200% | 0% | Disabled |
| Phase 1 | Months 7–18 | $500M | 175% | 5% | Reduced |
| Phase 2 | Months 19–36 | None | 150% | 15% | Full |
| Phase 3 | Months 36+ | None | 150% | 15% | Full + PQ migration |
Phase 0 operates as a single-collateral, high-collateral, overcollateralized stablecoin during cold start. Layer 4 dilutive backstop is disabled while SZK has no price discovery and the Stability Reserve Fund is filling.
Discussion
No central bank launches at full scale. No new commercial bank operates at full charter from day one. There is a reason. The phased architecture acknowledges that the protocol's cold-start risk is real — the Stability Reserve Fund is empty at genesis, SZK has no price discovery, collateral diversity is minimal — and constrains the system to a regime where those risks are bounded by external collateral surplus alone.
See Also
- § 4.6 · Parameter Table — the precise gating criteria for each phase transition
- § 4.4 · The Bounded-Dilution Proof — the regime the phased launch is staging into